movies

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label Kubrick (Stanley). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kubrick (Stanley). Show all posts

Saturday, February 16, 2013

A Clockwork Orange (1971) **

Posted on 4:50 PM by Unknown

MV5BMjE1NjcwMTYxM15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMjcxNDg3OA@@._V1_SY317_CR5,0,214,317_ (1)

Let me start off by saying that I find director Staley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange (1971) to be full of reprehensible violence and depravity—most of it aimed at women.  That said, I cannot deny that he also made a film worth some merit.  While I detest most everything that happens in it, it does raise questions about the relationship tumblr_m91cteszmW1qcooljo1_500between the state and the individual.  It is also stylishly designed and filled with great music.  Yet, after having watched this a few times before finally getting around to reviewing it, I can happily say that I plan never to watch it again.

Kubrick was not the first director to take on Anthony Burgess’ 1962 dystopian novel A Clockwork Orange. Many believed it could never be brought to the screen due to its complex and controversial themes.  Most are unaware that Andy Warhol and his Factory were the first “auteurs” to take on Alex DeLarge’s psychosis in Vinyl (1965). Simply put, it was horrible (I rue the day when I must rewatch it in order to review it here).  Thankfully, Kubrick’s film is comprised of competent actors working with an actual script and a professional production crew.

imagesMalcolm McDowell plays Alex, the leader of a gang of “droogs” (James Marcus, Warren Clarke, and Michael Tarn) who terrorize what appears to be a post-apocalyptic English city. In between trips to a milk bar they beat, rape and murder helpless people—a little bit of the ultra-violent (which for a long time I thought was pronounced ultraviolet, which just clouded my mind even more than it already was).  After murdering a rich cat-lady (Miriam Karlin) with a gigantic phallic sculpture (no, I’m not making this up), Alex is sentenced to 14-years in prison.  Wanting to shorten his term, he volunteers for an aversion therapy that rehabilitates criminals.  He undergoes a treatment that forces him to watch graphic images while having drugs flushed through his system which make him physically ill at the sight of violence. On one particular “viewing” the video is set to Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony—his particular favorite piece of music. (I only include this tidbit because it comes to be a form of both retribution and rebirth for Alex by the end of the movie.) Once released from prison, Alex is a helpless sort who cannot protect himself from anyone—those who would wish to do him harm or the state itself.

A Clockwork Orange is violent and misogynistic. People a_clockwork_orange_3are beaten with canes and phallic sculptures (yes, that again), and there is kicking and the like.  Women are raped and debased, and the female form itself is used in some of the most unusual ways of objectification (see: milk bar).  If I had to hear Alex say “a little bit of the old in an out” one more time I thought my head might explode.  It is specifically due to these elements that I find it exceptionally hard to believe that this garnered a Best Picture Oscar nomination—ah, but it was the 1970s and people were still coming down from their 1960s acid trips I suppose.

What I liked most about the movie was its art direction and soundtrack. Once you look past the more pornographic elements, there is much to admire about Russell Hagg and Peter Sheilds’ art direction. I expect LSD enthusiasts also enjoy the outlandish colors and set pieces that demand you look at them.  I often found the sets more entertaining than Alex-Bedspread-Clockwork-Orange1what was being said—they helped me cope with ideas, words, and deeds I vehemently disliked.  The soundtrack was also a soothing agent.  I’ve already mentioned that Beethoven's 9th plays a prominent role, but Rossini’s “The Thieving Magpie” and “William Tell” and Henry Purcell’s "March from 'Funeral Music for Queen Mary'" are also featured.  In addition, Wendy Carlos’ creepy synthesized music fits perfectly with the insidious depravity of this film. 

Overall, I dislike A Clockwork Orange, but not as much as I disliked Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (which makes a cameo at the record store).  There is a plot and I never once felt as though I were drifting off to sleep—how could I with such shocking images?  Still, this movie is just too reprehensibly amoral for me. 

Read More
Posted in **, 1971, Kubrick (Stanley) | No comments

Thursday, October 4, 2012

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) *1/2

Posted on 11:29 AM by Unknown

11160153_det

No, I don’t like Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968).  I’m sure I have offended countless sci-fi fans and cinephiles, but I don’t care because I find the film beyond boring. Yes, there are several interesting visual images, and for 1968, at the height of the Space Race, it was ahead of its time, but that doesn’t mean I have to revere it or recognize its perceived “greatness”.  The only thing I do like about it is the music—and even that contributes to the overall tedious effect the movie has on me.  If you fall asleep every time you watch something I think that sends a clear message. 

Based on sci-fi author and futurist Arthur C. Clarke’s 2001-04short story “The Sentinel”, 2001: A Space Odyssey is a plodding look at humankind’s relationship with the universe.  There is a monolith that keeps popping up: on Earth at the dawn of man, on the moon, and on Jupiter.  I expect all of these “sightings” are supposed to be tied together, but having not read Clarke’s series I have no idea how, as the film gave me no conclusive answer. I’m a historian by trade, but I minored in philosophy, so I kept asking myself if Kubrick chose to open and close his movie with Richard Strauss’ “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” because he was trying to make some sort of nihilistic statement about Nietzsche’s concept of eternal recurrence and the Übermensch. I suspect this is the case.  Okay, I somewhat understand what he was doing, but what about the average person on the street who never read Nietzsche or Clarke, do they get it?  Probably not, but I don’t think Kubrick cared, either. 

I have been told that people liked to drop LSD and then go watch this—I can see that.  There is an abundance of vast spatial dissonance and towards the end there is a plethora of psychedelic images, so I understand how this might appeal to Dead Heads.  For me, 2001-space-odysseythese images did one of two things: made me sleepy and/or gave me a headache. I’m not a special effects geek, and so while it is obvious that Kubrick and his crew were way ahead of their time, it does nothing for me.  Maybe I lack the ability to be awed by these endeavors because so much has been seen and discovered since this film was released.  Still, I can’t see how Pauline Kael wrote in 1968 that 2001: A Space Odyssey was "a monumentally unimaginative movie.” There is plenty of imagination, but, for me, that’s not enough to make me like it. 

Minimalism has its place, but too much of it in a film can leave viewers feeling completely detached.  That is the effect that 2001: A Space Odyssey has on me.  Sparse, minimal dialogue; sterile set designs; and, a complete denial of human pathos makes for bad cinema in my book.  To makes things worse, when Kubrick HAL9000does attempt to make an emotional appeal he does so with the supercomputer HAL (voiced by Douglas Rain), who is represented as both creepy and evil.  Is Kubrick making a statement about emotions?  Is there no room in his future world-view for feelings, and if you do have them does that make you deficient and/or deviant?  For a humanist like myself, that is an unbearable bitter pill to swallow.

The one element of the film that I liked was the music. Kubrick wanted to create a non-verbal experience, and you will notice that he uses music throughout the film except in the rare cases where there is actual dialogue.  While he bookends his movie with Strauss’ “Thus Spoke Zarathustra”, he also creatively uses Johann Strauss’ “On the Blue Danube” and imagesGyörgy Ligeti’s Requiem.  Still, even though I found Kubrick’s musical choices inspired, I also think they contribute to my desire to fall asleep every time I watch his movie. 

Overall, I don’t dig this film.  To me, it is boring and lacks any emotional appeal.  Yes, there are a number of enticing visuals, but that just isn’t enough for me. Plus, the creepy baby at the end gives me nightmares.

 

Read More
Posted in *1/2, 1968, Kubrick (Stanley) | No comments

Monday, February 28, 2011

The Shining (1980) **1/2

Posted on 11:02 PM by Unknown

shine

(This article is from guest contributor Sarkoffagus and first appeared at http://classic-film-tv.blogspot.com/.  The rating in the title is my own.)

Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) takes a job as caretaker of the Overlook Hotel for the winter. A struggling alcoholic who has been sober for five months, he plans to work on his latest “writing project,” while his wife, Wendy (Shelley Duvall), and son, Danny (Danny Lloyd), stay with him in the enormous hotel. Before the shining 01employees leave, a cook, Hallorann (Scatman Crothers), recognizes in Danny a shared extrasensory ability. Hallorann’s grandmother referred to ESP as “shining,” which the young boy handles by creating Tony, who lives in Danny’s mouth, talking to him and sometimes showing him pieces of future events. Danny can sense that the cook is afraid of Room 237, and Hallorann warns Danny to stay out of the room.


Jack had been informed by the hotel manager of the preceding caretaker, Charles Grady, who murdered his family with an axe before killing himself. Days pass, and Jack sleeps late, repeatedly tosses a ball against the wall, and nods off at the typewriter. As Jack’s behavior becomes progressively more antagonistic towards his wife and son, Danny has visions of mysterious sisters, bloody corridors, and the word “redrum” scrawled on a door. Soon, Jack is seeing people at the hotel, like the bartender, Lloyd, who serves him drinks, and it seems only a matter of time before the agitated writer picks up an axe.


Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining was not generally well received upon its 1980 release in theaters, but like several of Kubrick’s films, The Shining has, over time, garnered more fans and favorable reviews. Kubrick was well known for his rigorous shoots during production, a perfectionist for every shot of his films. His movie prior to The Shining, Barry Lyndon (1975), took an astounding 300 days to complete filming, whereas production for The Shining reportedly lasted over a year. Perhaps because of his lengthy shoots, Kubrick was never genuinely considered an “actor’s director,” as the actors sometimes were simply objects within a highly detailed construct (e.g., the privates standing at attention in 1987’s Full Metal Jacket or Alex and his droogs sitting at the milk bar in 1971’s A Clockwork Orange).


In The Shining, there are seemingly endless shots of far-reaching hallways and characters framed in vast, nearly empty rooms. Something as simple as Wendy bringing Jack his breakfast becomes an arduous task of rolling a service cart for a prolonged distance. Many horror films enclose characters within confined spaces (such as George A. Romero’s 1968 ghoul opus, Night of the Living Dead), but The Shining takes an alternate approach. There is plenty of room to move in the colossal hotel, but, like with so many of the hotel’s elements, it’s pure deceit. The isolated hotel is covered in a severe snow storm, so Danny and his mother can run, and they can even hide, but there truly is no escape.


There have been numerous readings of The Shining, with some critical writings or essays viewing the film as an allegory. While a literal translation of the film’s plot is not likely feasible, it is possible to focus more on its base components. Jack Torrance is either conversing with and being manipulated by ghosts or his mind is disintegrating (not unlike Jack Clayton’s 1961 The Innocents or its source text, Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw). Theories can support either belief, but Kubrick’s infamous concluding shot, closing in on a simple photograph, adds a new element to any potential interpretation.


The Shining was based on the Stephen King novel of the same name, which was adapted by Kubrick and author Diane Johnson. King has been vocal over his dissatisfaction with Kubrick’s film version. The author was most critical of the casting of Nicholson, believing that audiences would immediately see Nicholson as the mentally unstable character, as opposed to watching a man slowly fall apart. In 1997, King adapted his novel and produced a three-part miniseries directed by Mick Garris and starring Steven Weber and Rebecca De Mornay. The television version was filmed in part at the Stanley Hotel in Estes Park, Colorado, the hotel which inspired King’s original novel. Kubrick filmed some of the exteriors for the 1980 film at the Timberline Lodge in Oregon in lieu of the Stanley Hotel, another source of contention for King. (The interiors were filmed at Elstree Studios in England.)


The film’s Steadicam operator, Garrett Brown, invented the Steadicam, which he initially called the “Brown stabilizer.” He first utilized the Steadicam in Bound for Glory (1976) and won great acclaim for Rocky the same year, following Sylvester Stallone up the steps of the Philadelphia Art Museum. His design originally covered the area from the operator’s waist to head, but he was able to employ shots in The Shining at knee height (accomplished by utilizing a wheelchair), as the camera travels behind Danny on a Big Wheel in the Overlook’s hallways. The tracking shots in Kubrick’s film are extraordinary. They are fluid and follow Danny so closely that it gives the impression of being pulled against one’s will, intensifying the dread of the boy turning a corner, as one can never tell what will be standing there.


Soon after its initial theatrical release, Kubrick pulled the film and cut the ending. The final shot was the same, but there was a preceding scene that did little to explain the events of the movie. If anything, it unnecessarily piled on further intricacies to a labyrinth of ideas. There are apparently production shots, but the filmed scene reportedly no longer exists.


Wendy Carlos and Rachel Elkind composed a score for the film (Carlos had also written the Moog synthesizer music for Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange). However, very little of their music was used, as Kubrick opted for already existing classical music to cover most of the film’s soundtrack. In 2005, Carlos released the original material written for The Shining, with Rediscovering Lost Scores, Vol. 1 and 2 (also featuring selections from A Clockwork Orange and 1982’s Tron).


Though they are often referred to as “twins,” the ghostly Grady sisters in The Shining are simply dressed alike, as the film explains that the two girls are different ages. The well known line -- “Here’s Johnny!” -- was an ad-lib by Nicholson. Clearly a play on Ed McMahon’s introduction of Johnny Carson on The Tonight Show, Stanley Kubrick, who had been living in England for a number of years, reportedly did not comprehend the reference. Carson would later incorporate the scene in an introduction to one of the show’s anniversary specials.


The Shining is one of my favorite horror films. I’m a Kubrick fan, and although he didn’t concentrate on the horror genre, the famed director was able to create scenes of sheer intensity and disturbing imagery that sears itself into the viewers’ minds. It’s a movie that, if nothing else, makes me glad that I cannot afford to stay at a gigantic posh hotel.

Read More
Posted in **1/2, 1980, Kubrick (Stanley) | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters (1985) **
    On the morning of November 25, 1970, Yukio Mishima (Ken Ogata) was recognized as Japan’s greatest modern writer. By the end of the day he w...
  • Slacker (1991) :(((
    I graduated from high school the year director Richard Linklater’s Slacker (1991) came out.  I unequivocally knew no one who resembled the ...
  • Dodsworth (1936) **
    (This is my contribution to the Mary Astor Blogathon, hosted by Tales of the Easily Distracted and Silver Screenings. Please follow this lin...
  • To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) **1/2
    Who doesn’t wish their father was a little bit (or maybe a lot) like Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck)? Kind, soft-spoken, principled, honorable...
  • Sunset Boulevard (1950) ***
    Before there was The Artist (2011) there was director Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard (1950). Both movies shine a very bright light on ...
  • The Crowd (1928) **1/2
    We are born just like everyone else, right? So, why do we always think we are "special"? That’s the question director King Vidor ...
  • Grave of the Fireflies (Hotaru No Haka) 1988 **
    Suffice to say, Japanese animation would have made Walt Disney both proud and sad at the same time.  Aesthetically beautiful, but just so d...
  • The Mortal Storm (1940) ***
    Released more than one year before Pearl Harbor, director Frank Borzage’s The Mortal Storm (1940) was a Hollywood rarity—it openly critici...
  • Ninotchka (1939) ****
    When MGM marketed director Ernst Lubitsch’s political satirical 1939 comedy, Ninotchka , they used the catchphrase, “Garbo laughs”. While G...
  • Daybreak (Le jour se lève) 1939 **
    There are two important, though strange, reasons why director Marcel Carné’s Le jour se lève ( Daybreak , 1939) is still considered an imp...

Categories

  • :(((
  • *
  • **
  • ***
  • ****
  • ***1/2
  • **1/2
  • *1/2
  • 1902
  • 1903
  • 1915
  • 1916
  • 1919
  • 1920
  • 1921
  • 1922
  • 1923
  • 1924
  • 1925
  • 1926
  • 1927
  • 1928
  • 1929
  • 1930
  • 1931
  • 1932
  • 1933
  • 1934
  • 1935
  • 1936
  • 1937
  • 1938
  • 1939
  • 1940
  • 1941
  • 1942
  • 1943
  • 1944
  • 1945
  • 1946
  • 1947
  • 1948
  • 1949
  • 1950
  • 1951
  • 1953
  • 1954
  • 1955
  • 1956
  • 1957
  • 1959
  • 1960
  • 1962
  • 1963
  • 1964
  • 1965
  • 1966
  • 1967
  • 1968
  • 1969
  • 1970
  • 1971
  • 1972
  • 1973
  • 1975
  • 1976
  • 1977
  • 1978
  • 1979
  • 1980
  • 1981
  • 1982
  • 1983
  • 1985
  • 1986
  • 1987
  • 1988
  • 1989
  • 1991
  • 1992
  • 1993
  • 1994
  • 1995
  • 1996
  • 1998
  • 1999
  • 2000
  • 2002
  • 2004
  • 2005
  • 2006
  • 2007
  • 2010
  • 2011
  • 2012
  • Akerman (Chantal)
  • Aldrich (Robert)
  • Aleksandrov (Grigori)
  • Alfredson (Tomas)
  • Allen (Woody)
  • Antonioni (Michelangelo)
  • Arbuckle (Fatty)
  • Argento
  • Arliss (Leslie)
  • Aronofsky (Darren)
  • Arzner (Dorothy)
  • Bacon (Lloyd)
  • Beauvois (Xavier)
  • Becker (Jacques)
  • Bergman (Ingmar)
  • Berkeley (Busby)
  • Bertolucci (Bernardo)
  • Bigelow (Kathryn)
  • Blystone (John G.)
  • Borzage (Frank)
  • Brown (Clarence)
  • Browning (Tod)
  • Bruckman (Clyde)
  • Buñuel (Luis)
  • Camus (Marcel)
  • Capra (Frank)
  • Carné (Marcel)
  • Carpenter (John)
  • Chaney (Lon)
  • Chang Cheh
  • Chaplin (Charles)
  • Christensen (Benjamin)
  • Clair (René)
  • Clark (Bob)
  • Cleese (John)
  • Cline (Edward F.)
  • Clouse (Robert)
  • Cocteau (Jean)
  • Coen Brothers
  • Cooper (Merian)
  • Crichton (Charles)
  • Crosland (Alan)
  • Cukor (George)
  • Curtiz (Michael)
  • de Antonio (Emile)
  • Demy (Jacques)
  • Dieterle (William)
  • Dmytryk (Edward)
  • Donen (Stanley)
  • Dovzhenko (Aleksandr)
  • Dreyer (Carl Theodor)
  • Dulac (Germaine)
  • Duvivier (Julien)
  • Eisenstein (Sergei M.)
  • Fellini (Federico)
  • Feuillade (Louis)
  • Fincher (David)
  • Flaherty (Robert J.)
  • Fleming (Victor)
  • Ford (John)
  • Fosse (Bob)
  • Frankenheimer (John)
  • Friedkin (William)
  • Gance (Abel)
  • Garnett (Tay)
  • Gibson (Mel)
  • Godard (Jean-Luc)
  • Griffith (D.W.)
  • Guitry (Sacha)
  • Haines (Randa)
  • Hamilton (Guy)
  • Haneke (Michael)
  • Hathaway (Henry)
  • Hawks (Howard)
  • Hazanavicius (Michel)
  • Herzog (Werner)
  • Hill (George Roy)
  • Hitchcock (Alfred)
  • Hooper (Tom)
  • Howe (J.A.)
  • Huston (John)
  • Ivory (James)
  • Jeunet (Jean-Pierre)
  • Jewison (Norman)
  • Jonze (Spike)
  • Julian (Rupert)
  • Kachyňa (Karel)
  • Kazan (Elia)
  • Keaton (Buster)
  • Keighley (William)
  • Kelly (Gene)
  • Kershner (Irvin)
  • Kieslowski (Krzysztof)
  • Kim (Sang-jin)
  • Kim Ki-duk
  • King Hu
  • Kubrick (Stanley)
  • Kurosawa (Akira)
  • La Cava (Gregory)
  • Lang (Fritz)
  • Laughton (Charles)
  • Lean (David)
  • Lee (Ang)
  • Lee (Spike)
  • Leone (Sergio)
  • LeRoy (Mervyn)
  • Linklater (Richard)
  • Lloyd (Frank)
  • Lubitsch (Ernst)
  • Luhrmann (Baz)
  • Lumet (Sidney)
  • Luske (Hamilton)
  • Ma-Xu Weibang
  • Mamoulian (Rouben)
  • Mankiewicz (Joseph L.)
  • Mann (Anthony)
  • Marshall (George)
  • Maysles Brothers
  • McCarey (Leo)
  • McLeod (Norman Z.)
  • McQueen (Steve)
  • Méliès (Georges)
  • Melville (Jean -Pierre)
  • Mendes (Sam)
  • Menzies (William Cameron)
  • Meyer (Russ)
  • Micheaux (Oscar)
  • Milestone (Lewis)
  • Minnelli (Vincent)
  • Mizoguchi (Kenji)
  • Moland (Hans Petter)
  • Morris (Chris)
  • Mulligan (Robert)
  • Murnau (F.W.)
  • Nichols (Mike)
  • Nolan (Christopher)
  • Olivier (Laurence)
  • Ophüls (Max)
  • Osten (Franz)
  • Ozu (Yasujiro)
  • Pabst (Georg Wilhelm)
  • Pagnol (Marcel)
  • Peckinpah (Sam)
  • Peixoto (Mario)
  • Peli (Oren)
  • Petersen (Wolfgang)
  • Polanski (Roman)
  • Ponting (Herbert G.)
  • Porter (Edwin S.)
  • Powell and Pressburger
  • Preminger (Otto)
  • Pudovkin (Vsevolod)
  • Raimi (Sam)
  • Redford (Robert)
  • Reed (Carol)
  • Reggio (Godfrey)
  • Reiniger (Lotte)
  • Reisner (Charles)
  • Renoir (Jean)
  • Resnais (Alain)
  • Riefenstahl (Leni)
  • Robinson (Bruce)
  • Robson (Mark)
  • Rossellini (Roberto)
  • Sandrich (Mark)
  • Sayles (John)
  • Schoedsack (Ernest B.)
  • Schrader (Paul)
  • Scorsese (Martin)
  • Scott (Ridley)
  • Seiter (William A.)
  • Sharpsteen (Ben)
  • Sheridan (Jim)
  • Sherman (Lowell)
  • Sirk (Douglas)
  • Sjöström (Victor)
  • Sluizer (George)
  • Smith (Jack)
  • Spielberg (Steven)
  • Stevens (George)
  • Sturges (Preston)
  • Takahata (Isao)
  • Tati (Jacques)
  • Taviani Brothers
  • Téchiné (André)
  • Tourneur (Jacques)
  • Ulmer (Edgar G.)
  • Van Dyke (W.S.)
  • Varda (Agnes)
  • Vertov (Dziga)
  • Vidor (Charles)
  • Vidor (King)
  • Vigo (Jean)
  • von Sternberg (Josef)
  • von Stroheim (Erich)
  • Waggner (George)
  • Walsh (Raoul)
  • Weir (Peter)
  • Welles (Orson)
  • Wellman (William A.)
  • Whale (James)
  • Wiene (Robert)
  • Wilde (Ted)
  • Wilder (Billy)
  • Wise (Robert)
  • Wood (Sam)
  • Wyler (William)
  • Yonggang (Wu)
  • Zwerin (Charlotte)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2014 (43)
    • ▼  July (4)
      • Voyage to Italy (Viaggio in Italia) 1953 **
      • An American in Paris (1951) **
      • Jeanne Dielman, 23, Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxell...
      • Guys and Dolls (1955) **1/2
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2013 (69)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2012 (59)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2011 (54)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2010 (86)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (55)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile